Some of our commentators were endorsing it."įox Corp. When asked whether Fox News embraced the idea of election fraud, he pointed instead to his own stars: "No. Similarly, Murdoch sought to distinguish between the two in his sworn remarks. has tried to sidestep the case, saying the decisions were left up to the executives and journalists within Fox News. is arguing that the parent company and its top executives are wrongly being held responsible for reporting on the baseless assertions of a president and his advisers.įox denies executives had "direct role" in broadcasting false claimsĭominion initially sued the network and its parent company separately. That's the picture that emerges in evidence presented Monday by the voting-tech company Dominion Voting Systems in a blockbuster $1.6 billion defamation suit against both Fox News and its parent company, Fox Corp.ĭominion's legal team is presenting only the evidence it believes will propel its case Fox Corp. Instead, Murdoch, the network's controlling owner, followed the lead of the network's senior executives in sidestepping the truth for a pro-Trump audience angered when confronted by the facts.Īsked whether he could have told Fox News' chief executive and its stars to stop giving airtime to Rudy Giuliani - a key Trump campaign attorney peddling election lies - Murdoch assented. In the heat of the moment, right after Election Day 2020, media magnate Rupert Murdoch knew that the hosts on his prized Fox News Channel were endorsing lies from then-President Donald Trump about election fraud.Īnd he did nothing to intervene to stop it. bosses Rupert Murdoch (left) and Lachlan Murdoch (right) were deeply involved in shaping editorial decisions at Fox News. Last week NBCUniversal cut a deal to bring 2024 Olympics coverage to Twitter, including a live show that will be exclusive to the platform.In a $1.6 billion defamation suit, Dominion Voting Systems argues that Fox Corp. The specific reason, or reasons, that Carlson was ousted remains unclear, with redacted text messages, ongoing lawsuits and Rupert Murdoch’s whims being among the theories cited by observers.Īssuming Carlson’s show moves forward, Twitter will have a pair of notable video programs on its platform next year. It is not immediately clear whether that clause applies in this case.įox News parted ways with Carlson just two weeks ago in a stunning move that caught the media business off guard. While the specifics of Carlson’s contract are not public, anchors usually have so-called “pay or play” clauses in their contracts that can see them paid out while keeping them off of competitors’ platforms. The Twitter CEO added, “I hope that many others, particularly from the left, also choose to be content creators on this platform.” He explained that the host would benefit from subscriptions and advertising revenue share, which Musk said would be a new feature for the platform. Musk, who was interviewed by Carlson a few weeks ago on his now-canceled Fox News show, tweeted later in the day that Carlson had “not signed a deal of any kind whatsoever” with Twitter. The announcement suggests in no uncertain terms that the Elon Musk-owned social platform will play host to Carlson’s program - or at least a version of it - even as he navigates an exit agreement with Fox News, which is being negotiated by attorney Bryan Freedman. Linda Yaccarino's Next Act: Convincing Brands to Buy Elon Musk's Twitter Vision
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |